|
Exceptionally high temperatures occurred in Western Europe in 2003,
causing various heat and drought-related impacts, both on human health
and environment. Heatwaves are often accompanied by power failures,
high levels of local air pollution, failures in the water supply, excess
forest fires and excess heat-related mortality. At the end of the hot
2003 summer, authorities reported high mortality figures (EEA 2003a,
UNECE 2003a, and WHO 2003).
|
Two firemen dwarfed by giant flames during forest fires
in Southern France.
Source: REUTERS/Pascal Deschamps |
There is no doubt that hot and dry weather conditions can make
fires much more severe. Direct pressures that cause fires vary
widely and are both social and ecological in nature. Prevention
and control strategies address public awareness, repression of
crime, silvicultural cleaning measures to reduce the fuel load,
and economic incentives for appropriate management measures, as
well as effective fire suppression.
As with the heavy rainfall and floods in Central Europe in 2002,
the 2003 extreme weather-related events in Europe cannot be attributed
to climate change and its pressures alone, but they show what
may happen if climate change continues. Europe has experienced
an unprecedented rate of warming in recent decades, with an overall
temperature rise of as much as 2 ºC over large areas of the
Arctic since the early 1950s (Bernes 2002, Klein Tank and others
2002). Average temperatures are expected to further increase,
droughts are likely to become more frequent in various parts of
Europe, and heatwaves, although rare at present, could become
more frequent, intense and longer (Houghton and others 2001).
The cost of climate change mitigation in Western Europe can be
reduced significantly through the use of mechanisms under the
Kyoto Protocol (EEA 2003b). In Eastern Europe, greenhouse gas
mitigation costs are expected to be lower than in Western Europe
but investments are needed in the energy sector (EEA 2003b). The
Russian Federation, which is likely to have a significant surplus
of emission allowances, could play a central role in the ratification
process of the protocol as well as in the future market for GHG
allowances (EEA 2003b). By the end of 2003, however, the Kyoto
Protocol, had not yet entered into force.
|
Key
Facts |
- With the Treaty of Accession between the EU and the
10 accession countries, signed in April, Europe has
entered a new era with numerous implications for the
region’s environment.
- The May 2003 Environment for Europe Ministerial Conference
in Kyiv, Ukraine, adopted among others, three pan-European
protocols – the Protocol on Strategic Environmental
Assessment to the Convention on Environmental Impact
Assessment in a Transboundary Context; the Protocol
on Civil Liability and Damage Caused by the Transboundary
Effects of Industrial Accidents on Transboundary Waters
to the Conventions on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial
Accidents and on the Protection and Use of Transboundary
Waters and International Lakes; and the Protocol on
Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers to the Aarhus
Convention.
- A Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Development
of the Carpathians was adopted and signed by the seven
countries of the Carpathians in May 2003 in the margins
of the Kyiv Conference. A Framework Convention for the
Protection of the Marine Environment of the Caspian
Sea was signed in November 2003 by the five riparian
countries.
- As of 31 December 2003, a total of 27 countries had
ratified, approved, accepted or acceded to the Aarhus
Convention (Access to Information, Public Participation
in Decision-making, and Access to Justice in Environmental
Matters), five of which did so in 2003.
- In 2003, the issue of environment and security was
further pursued through a UNEP, UNDP and the Organization
for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) project
which established a mechanism to examine and address
linkages between environmental problems and ‘hot
spots’ and security issues affecting nations and
people.
- The latest greenhouse gas emission projections show
that neither existing, nor additionally-planned domestic
policies and measures by member states to reduce emissions
will be sufficient to allow the EU to reach its Kyoto
target.
|
| Sources: EEA 2003b and 2003c, UNECE 2003b,
2003c, 2003d, 2003e and 2003f |
|
|