IEA Training Manual - Module 5

4.2 What is the specific STATE-and-TRENDS of the environment for each priority issue?

Priority environmental issues as identified above are often quite general (e.g., water quality, air quality, biodiversity). As we go forward, it is important to be more specific with regard to each priority environmental issue. This will make it much easier to identify what is happening to the environment and why.

Consider water quality for example. This issue is sometimes specified in an aggregate form (e.g., a country’s national water quality index). To conduct an integrated analysis it is necessary to think of water quality in a more spatially defined context. For example, a certain river and lake system might be particularly problematic at the time you are developing your IEA. The following case illustrates this level of specificity, building on an earlier case study under Section 3. This example will be used in later sections to illustrate the telling of an integrated story using the DPSIR framework.

Case Example

Figure 7: Flow adjusted nitrogen
concentration in the Red River north
(downstream) of Winnipeg
(Armstrong 2001).

The state of water quality in the Red River, Province of Manitoba, Canada

For an example of an environmental state issue, consider water quality in Lake Winnipeg (introduced in section 4). From 1978 through 2000, there was an increase in nutrient concentration ( in the Red River flowing into Lake Winnipeg, particularly north of the city of Winnipeg (approximately 600 000 inhabitants) and where two other rivers, the Assiniboine and Seine, merge with the Red River.

The figure below illustrates the increase in total nitrogen concentration between 1978 and 2000 at a monitoring station north of the city of Winnipeg, MB. The increase of nitrogen concentration in a major river flowing into Lake Winnipeg is relevant for IEA analysis, as nitrogen in excessive quantities can be one of the common factors in causing algal blooms and other water quality problems. This piece of information is necessary, but insufficient to understand the nature of water quality problems in the lake, as there may also be other causal agents at work that would need to be monitored and understood.


Write comment:

Posted by:
- - 10 Mar 2012
hW2ZXz , [url=]yysavexnbyvl[/url], [link=]glmjaplchkmq[/link],
- - 07 Mar 2012
I was having a cvorensation the other day with some friends of mine about the fallacy of electric vehicles. Where does the electricity come from? Mostly burning coal, which completely defeats the purpose of an electric vehicle. Sure, you may get some cleaner air in Los Angeles, but the air around the coal facilities is going to get worse.Remember when there was the push for plastic bags because paper bags were bad? Now we know that plastic is horrible for the environment, so either bring your own bag or use the trees.
Module 5 - Integrated analysis of environmental trends and policies
< Previous Page    Next Page >