OVERVIEW
Environmental standards in environmental
management are an important tool which ensures the right to a clean
and healthy environment for all people living on this earth. The countries
of East Africa are undergoing a high level of socio- economic transformation
which trend has an impact on the environment in terms of threatening
the carrying capacity of the natural resources available. Use of environmental
standards by these countries will therefore ensure that while the countries
develop discharges and emissions do not adversely and significantly
harm the environment and natural resources. The environmental standards,
when applied in this sub-region will ensure efficiency, and competitiveness
in investments.
The Process of developing and harmonizing
environmental standards under this project was started in 1997, when
a regional workshop on methodology for the development of environmental
standards was held in Kisumu, Kenya. It was attended by representatives
from the regulatory authorities of, among others Kenya, Tanzania and
Uganda, including some of the consultants who eventually prepared these
country reports. The purpose of the workshop was to develop and harmonize
the general criteria and methodology for the development of environmental
standards. The national teams were thereafter required to apply the
methodologies in an exercise to develop national reports and standards
even if these are tentative.
Kenya Country Report
The Kenyan Country Report approaches
the issue of environmental standards through the legal base of existing
legislation and standards at national level as well as guidelines and
norms offered at national and international levels.
A comprehensive legal review is given
which shows that Kenya lacks a comprehensive legal and institutional
mechanism to deal, among others, with issues of environmental standards.
This situation, however, exists even though Kenya has a number of reports,
policies, guidelines on the subject. The"existing Standards"
which are shown in the report have no legal basis since they have not
been formally enacted.
The report further reviews a number of
critical cases to justify the need for establishment of environmental
standards, most of which are concerned with emissions or discharges
from industry and mobile sources, especially motorized vehicles.
The Kenyan Country Report further reviews,
in great detail, scientific knowledge and technology on "environmental
standards". This review is mostly from international sources such
as International Labour Organization (ILO), World Health Organization
(WHO), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO); Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and International Standards
Organization (ISO); among others. The review of scientific knowledge
and technology relates to the importance of pollution control of air,
water and soil.
The sources of the pollution are also
reviewed. In all the areas under consideration, great detail is given
to objectives, as well as priority areas needing control especially
emission and discharge reduction techniques, among others.
On soil quality standards, the Kenyan
report notes that no standards have ever been developed, although methods
of analysis of soil were published in 1980. The report proposes standards
for air, water and soil. On effluent discharge standards, proposals
are given for inland waters and public sewers. Methodology on formulation,
testing and enforcement of the standards is given using a logical framework.
This includes comparison with other developing countries as well as
with some developed countries.
The Kenya Country Report, at the end,
provides a detailed capacity building proposal for the development and
enforcement of the environmental standards. Capacity building will be
required in institutions responsible for the various standards, in air
quality management, training for water quality monitoring, laboratories
for soil testing and equipment. At the sub- regional level, with environment
being a sphere of co-operation, to incorporate strategies for collaborative
research and training in environmental standards will be quite appropriate.
In conclusion, the Kenya Country Report
has a concentration on air quality issues thus showing it as a major
problem in Kenya.
Tanzania Country Report
The Tanzania Country Report takes an
approach fairly similar to that of Kenya. It is based on a comprehensive
review of the laws, guidelines, norms and standards relating to air,
water and soils. Most of the laws that exist have some relevance to
standards, but are generalized and hence not easily enforceable in courts
of law. The Water Utilization Act, however, is the only legislation
which sets standards for water quality. Standards have also been developed
for water quality, worker safety and consumer goods.
The report reviews standards and guidelines
on environment by providing examples of legislation on ambient receptors,
emissions, and specification standards in a theoretical setting. It
further reviews national legislation on the matters relating to environmental
standards. The report reviews the scientific knowledge and technology
on environmental standards by providing, in a tabular form, proposals
for waste water, maximum concentrations for metal pollutants in drinking
waters, effluent standards, standards for organic substances, and receiving
water standards.
While acknowledging the stage of Tanzania's
industrial development, the report acknowledges the need to take precautions
to ensure that the country does not suffer from heavy pollution. In
this regard, air pollution, apart from urban areas, is on average low.
As regards soil standards, the Tanzania
report provides a very brief statement thus indicating the low priority
of the need for such standards. Classification and prioritization of
environmental standards is shown in the areas of waste-water, drinking
water, air quality and to some extent soils standards. In the area of
waste water, standards, methodology and criteria for measurement, and
the preferred testing methods are provided. A list of heavy metals which
require regulations is also indicated. Like the Kenyan Country Report,
the Tanzania report provides a capacity building mechanism. The mechanism
has a comprehensive proposal for institutional licensing of polluting
sources and integrated approaches to licensing. These mechanisms are
intended to eliminate duplication and inefficiency in licensing, inspections
and enforcement efforts. A Technical Committee on licensing is also
proposed to license polluting sources.
The Tanzania Report also provides proposals
for enforcement of environmental standards within and across boarders,
that is, East Africa region. It also contains proposals for the use
of financial incentives and tools, streamlining of the judicial processes
and penalties. Other enforcement mechanisms such as performance bonds,
restoration orders, record keeping and inspections are proposed.
In conclusion, the Tanzania report provides
a good basis for further development of environmental standards at the
national level. Related to this, and at a sub-regional level, the report
proposes that a joint institution be established on promulgation and
enforcement of environmental standards under the aegis of the East African
Tripartite Commission.
Uganda Country Report
Unlike the Kenyan and Tanzanian approaches,
Uganda used a different methodology in developing her component of environmental
standards under this project. During the Kisumu Workshop on Development
of Methodologies and Criteria for Standards, Uganda revealed that she
had already embarked on the issue of developing environmental standards.
Uganda had used task forces and technical committees. Therefore, under
this project, Uganda opted to develop and harmonize soils quality standards
only.
The Uganda Country Report on soils management
standards was found a priority as it is generally believed that it is
a pre- requisite for the long term sustainability of agricultural sector
especially on croplands, forests, wetlands and rangeland ecosystems
and overall environment management. This is an indicator that Uganda
attaches great priority on agricultural productivity.
Unlike the reports from Kenya and Tanzania,
the Uganda report did not review existing laws. This activity had been
carried out under the National Environment Act Plan (NEAP) Process 1991
- 1995 where it was found that no legally binding standards or guidelines
exist on soils standards.
A review of the major environmental problems,
the impacts of various uses on the soil, are however, presented. It
is seen from the report that Uganda has been conducting soils resource
inventories since 1933. In the process, they had developed some working
guidelines on soils fertility and productivity and a soils maps were
in place, though out-dated. A land-use characteristics of Uganda is
also in place.
The report presents draft soils quality standards for:
agricultural land-use (using rain-fed
agriculture);
special cases (acidic)
irrigated agriculture
wetland rice systems under natural
flooding
wetland rice under irrigated
systems
The Uganda report, like that in Kenya
and Tanzania provides parameters and methods for determination for chemical
and physical standards. Related to the soil quality standards, the report
provides soils conservation guidelines for varying topographical areas
as seen from the national context. The necessary implementation requirements,
frequency of monitoring and cost implication of the soil quality standards
are also provided in the report.
Bearing in mind that a certain small
but very important population live in urban areas, the report also provides
for standards for land-use in urban areas. These standards basically
deal with social facilities and waste management standards e.g. landfill
management. Under this category, substantive details are provided on
the location, inspection process, indirect discharges into landfills,
site closure and monitoring of landfills.
In conclusion, the contents of the report
from Uganda has since been taken up by the Government and the Environmental
Standards (Soils Management Standards) Regulations, 1999 has been drafted.
It is expected that by the end of 1999, these draft regulations will
become law in Uganda. The soil conservation guidelines and the standards
for waste management have been adopted for use by farmers and other
appropriate regulatory authorities and stakeholders.