United Nations Environment Programme

environment for development

 
Division of Environmental Law and Conventions
Manual on Compliance with and Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Alert someone to this resource Leave Feedback Home > Enforcement > Institutional Frameworks > Coordination Among Relevant Authorities > Case Study
Participatory Mapping and Indigenous Communities

Participatory mapping is an emerging tool to empower local communities and indigenous peoples to become more involved in natural resource management and environmental protection. The Center for the Support of Native Lands has been a pioneer in participatory mapping, particularly of indigenous lands in Central and South America, but also in Africa and Southeast Asia. Since the early 1990s, Native Lands has refined its methodology, which is set forth in Indigenous Landscapes: A Study in Ethnocartography (2001). This in-depth analysis of participatory mapping projects constitutes a practical guide to community mapping with indigenous peoples worldwide.

Indigenous Landscapes describes an approach consisting of three to workshops interspersed with two fieldwork periods. This typically takes approximately three to four months. Project participants are indigenous researchers, a small cartography team, and project directors. Indigenous researchers chosen by the communities gather data for the maps, which contain three types of information: (1) the salient features, natural and man-made, of the territory being mapped (rivers, creeks, swamps, hills; villages, roads, trails), together with their names; (2) zones used for subsistence activities (hunting; fishing; farming; gathering of medicines, fruit, and building materials; and any other significant cultural use area); and (3) areas of cultural and spiritual importance. During the process, the cartographers assist the indigenous people to put this information onto cartographically accurate maps. The first workshop, of a week in duration, orients participants to the process and discusses data gathering techniques, map symbolism, and the general structure of the project. The indigenous researchers then spend approximately one month in their communities piecing together information from village elders and those knowledgeable about the forest and placing this information on hand-drawn sketch maps. At the end of this period, they return for a second workshop in which they work with the cartographic team to transcribe this information onto georeferenced maps. Over a period of two to three weeks, the researchers and the cartographers work with field data, aerial photographs, satellite images, and government base maps, cross-checking the different types of evidence to produce a new map containing a wealth of cultural information of the region. When this is completed, the researchers return to the communities to verify the draft maps, fill in gaps, clear up confusions, and generally fine-tune the maps. There is ample time at this juncture for the villages to discuss a variety of issues among themselves. In the third workshop the researchers work with the cartographic team to finalize the maps.

Participatory mapping has proven to be an integral tool to informed decisionmaking, environmental protection, and empowerment of indigenous and traditional peoples. The maps have been used as a basis for designating biosphere reserves and indigenous areas, as well as developing management plans for national parks. The maps and the process of developing the maps have strengthened community-based natural resource management, and are used in local schools. They have identified and fortified connections between forest protection and indigenous territories. By fostering conservation partnerships, illegal logging has diminished significantly in certain mapped areas. Developing the maps have built local capacity and stimulated the formation of strategic alliances nationally and regionally through exchange of information and discussion of common problems and strategies. Accordingly, indigenous peoples today are participating more fully than they were a decade earlier in decisions affecting their homelands, their natural resources, and their cultures.

For more information, see http://www.nativelands.org

A A Print this page
Search the Manual
Guidelines Search
Case Studies Search
» More Search Tools
Resources for
Guideline 42
Case Studies
Nigeria’s Institutional Response to the CCD
Burkina Faso’s Conference of the National Council on Environment and Sustainable Development
DRC’s Inter-Ministerial Committee on Environment, Nature Conservation, and Tourism
Coordination to Develop Brazil’s National Program to Combat Desertification
Institutional Coordination and Capacity Building in Morocco to Implement the Rio Conventions
The Gambia’s Network of Enforcement Personnel
Mauritius’ Environment Coordination Committee
Improving Institutional Coordination in Cameroon, Especially Relating to MEAs
Institutional Coordination of Brazilian Ministries in Implementing the Antarctic Treaty
National/Sub-national Relationships in Federal Systems: State/Environmental Protection Agency Enforcement Agreements in the United States
Capacity Building for District By-Law Formulation and Enforcement in Uganda
Implementing MEAs in the Decentralized Context of Benin
Community-Based Trophy Hunting Programme in Pakistan
Public Involvement in Malawi’s National Council for the Environment
Ensuring Implementation through Compensation, Retraining, and Reinstallation in Seychelles
Cooperative Efforts in Environmental Management in the Philippines
Coordination with the Private Sector to Develop Projects in Georgia
Public Coordination Council in Belarus
Participatory Mapping and Indigenous Communities
Public-Private Management of the Gola Rainforest Conservation Concession Project in Sierra Leone
A Public-Private Partnership to Develop Seychelles’s National Plant Conservation Strategy
Coordination through Environmental Cells in Burkina Faso
Ecotourism Concessions in Ivory Coast
Public-Private Dialogues in Brazil
H.M. Revenue and Customs of the United Kingdom
Environmental Technical Assistance for Zambian Customs Officials
Providing Assistance to the Customs Administration in Lebanon
Strengthening the Capacity of Customs Officers and Inspectors in Cameroon
Additional Resources
Additional Resources on Coordinating with NGOs and the Private Sector
© UNEP | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map