United Nations Environment Programme

environment for development

 
Division of Environmental Law and Conventions
Manual on Compliance with and Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Alert someone to this resource Leave Feedback Home > Enforcement > Institutional Frameworks > Designation of Responsibilities > Checklist
Checklist for Prosecuting Environmental Cases

Many issues may be raised and disputed in typical enforcement actions. Enforcement officials should be prepared to:

  • Assemble and review evidence sufficient to establish a violation of law, including working with investigators and experts.
  • Prove that a violation has occurred. The standard of proof may vary, depending on whether the prosecution is administrative, civil, or criminal and how liability is imposed (e.g., negligence, strict liability).
  • Establish that the procedures and policies were fairly and equitably followed and that the violator is not being unduly “singled out.”
  • Demonstrate the underlying environmental or public health purpose for the requirement being violated, or harm caused or threatened to be caused to those interests by the violation. (It may be necessary to reiterate the importance of the requirement, and compliance with the requirement, to justify and support an enforcement case. This is particularly true when a case is being argued in front of an independent decision-maker who is not familiar with the requirement or its environmental or public health benefits).
  • Demonstrate that a remedy for the violation is available (e.g., affordable pollution control equipment). Even though this is not usually the responsibility of the Government, this information can be important to negotiations.
  • Establish the damages caused by the violation or establish the appropriate sanction or remedy that the law sets for the violation. Often laws provide a range of sanctions, and a prosecutor may need to prove to the trier of fact (e.g., the judge) what is the appropriate fine or other sanction.
  • Demonstrate the ability of the violator to pay, e.g. showing that a “poor” facility is owned by a wealthy parent company. This also goes to the appropriateness of the requested penalty.
  • In appropriate cases, consider the alternative of settlement, especially if an agreement can be worked out that may provide greater benefits to public health or the environment.

This checklist expands upon materials from INECE.

A A Print this page
Search the Manual
Guidelines Search
Case Studies Search
» More Search Tools
Resources for
Guideline 41(a)
Case Studies
Kenya’s Environmental Institutional Framework
Jamaica’s Natural Resources Conservation Authority
Vertical Designation of Enforcement Responsibilities for Enforcing Pollution-Control Laws in the United States
Mapping Brazil’s Coral Reefs
Participatory Management and Monitoring of Protected Areas in the Philippines
Remote Sensing and other Emerging Information Sources
Mekong River: Sub-Regional Environmental Information and Monitoring System
Recording of Environmental Violations in The Gambia
Indian Government Environmental Information System
Public Disclosure of Corporate Environmental Performance in Ghana
Use of Affidavits in Argentina’s Water Law
Self-Monitoring Required by U.S. Environmental Laws
Brazil’s Participatory Process for Gathering Information on Biodiversity
Capacity Building for Judicial Officers and Practitioners in Uganda
Court-Appointed Experts in Croatia
Federal Sentencing Guidelines in the United States
UNEP’s Judges Programme
Specialised Environmental Administrative Tribunals and Prosecutors in the United States
EU Forum of Judges for the Environment
Cameroon’s Efforts to Strengthen the Capacity of Magistrates and Other Legal Officers
Checklists
Checklist for Prosecuting Environmental Cases
Checklist for Assistance to Courts
Additional Resources
Additional Resources For Monitoring And Evaluation
© UNEP | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map