United Nations Environment Programme

environment for development

 
Division of Environmental Law and Conventions
Manual on Compliance with and Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Alert someone to this resource Leave Feedback Home > Enforcement > Institutional Frameworks > Designation of Responsibilities > Case Study
Capacity Building for Judicial Officers and Practitioners in Uganda

Since the introduction of environmental law in Uganda in the mid 1990s, various Ugandan institutions have held a variety of training activities to build capacity and awareness of environmental law and improve access to environmental justice. Awareness and training has been carried out in four general areas: (1) introduction to environmental law, (2) principles of environmental management, (3) procedural issues in environmental law, and (4) access to environmental justice.

In 1995, UNEP in collaboration with NEMA held two back-to-back Africa regional workshops in Kampala for lawyers from the Anglophone and Francophone countries, in which about 10 Ugandan lawyers were exposed to environmental litigation. Starting in 1997, Greenwatch (a Ugandan NGO) partnered with NEMA, the Environmental Law Institute (ELI), the World Resources Institute (WRI), and various institutions from Uganda and East Africa (including universities) to train judges, magistrates, private lawyers, state attorneys, and public interest lawyers on environmental law and litigation (including aspects of criminal environmental prosecution). Workshops typically trained 20-40 people at a time. One series of workshops focused on building capacity of the judiciary (including magistrates), while another targeted over 150 state attorneys and public prosecutors. As a result of the training courses, many judges and a growing number of magistrates are now well-versed in substantive and procedural matters related to environmental law.

Moreover, the public and private sector attorneys who prosecute environmental cases are better equipped to bring environmental cases before a judiciary that has the capacity to decide those cases.

In addition to building capacity, the training courses have yielded valuable materials. The course materials that have been developed, tested, and refined are in the process of being developed into a casebook on environmental law and a handbook on environmental law (see case study on “Uganda’s Casebook and Handbook on Environmental Law” following Guideline 43).

For more information, contact Mr. Kenneth Kakuru at kenneth@greenwatch.or.ug

A A Print this page
Search the Manual
Guidelines Search
Case Studies Search
» More Search Tools
Resources for
Guideline 41(a)
Case Studies
Kenya’s Environmental Institutional Framework
Jamaica’s Natural Resources Conservation Authority
Vertical Designation of Enforcement Responsibilities for Enforcing Pollution-Control Laws in the United States
Mapping Brazil’s Coral Reefs
Participatory Management and Monitoring of Protected Areas in the Philippines
Remote Sensing and other Emerging Information Sources
Mekong River: Sub-Regional Environmental Information and Monitoring System
Recording of Environmental Violations in The Gambia
Indian Government Environmental Information System
Public Disclosure of Corporate Environmental Performance in Ghana
Use of Affidavits in Argentina’s Water Law
Self-Monitoring Required by U.S. Environmental Laws
Brazil’s Participatory Process for Gathering Information on Biodiversity
Capacity Building for Judicial Officers and Practitioners in Uganda
Court-Appointed Experts in Croatia
Federal Sentencing Guidelines in the United States
UNEP’s Judges Programme
Specialised Environmental Administrative Tribunals and Prosecutors in the United States
EU Forum of Judges for the Environment
Cameroon’s Efforts to Strengthen the Capacity of Magistrates and Other Legal Officers
Checklists
Checklist for Prosecuting Environmental Cases
Checklist for Assistance to Courts
Additional Resources
Additional Resources For Monitoring And Evaluation
© UNEP | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map