United Nations Environment Programme

environment for development

 
Division of Environmental Law and Conventions
Manual on Compliance with and Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Alert someone to this resource Leave Feedback Home > Enforcement > Institutional Frameworks > Economic Instruments > Case Study
Financing Conservation Efforts by Selling the Naming Rights of New Species

Where financial resources are limited, creative solutions can be effective in raising additional funding necessary for environmental initiatives. One such approach is selling the right to name a recently discovered species. In fact, in recent years, conservation NGOs around the world have identified many new species and raised funds for their efforts through the sale or auction of naming rights. This approach could also provide financing opportunities for States, particularly those States that are rich in biological diversity.

This sponsorship of new species can have several benefits. It raises funds to support research on biological diversity (including taxonomic research). The funds also can be used for targeted conservation projects that enhance the survival of the newly discovered species, as well as other species. The process can also support regional management of and interest in local ecosystems.

According to internationally accepted scientific protocols, such as the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, the person (usually a scientist) that first identifies a new species has the right to determine its formal scientific name (in Latin). Historically, scientists often have named species based on their physical characteristics, their geographic origin, and other objective criteria. In many instances, though, scientists have used their prerogative to name the species after themselves, after family members, after patrons or benefactors of the expedition, or for other subjective criteria. In essence, this new approach seeks benefactors after the fact, that is after the expedition and after the discovery.

When scientists working for specific conservation NGOs discover a new species, the NGO can seek “sponsorship” of the new species by selling or auctioning the naming rights. Of course, there are limits on what name can be given to the new species. In order to maintain taxonomic consistency, the sellers ensure that suggested names are not offensive and that they generally follow international rules of nomenclature.

The idea behind these sales was first developed by Gerhard Haszprunar, a professor of systematic zoology at the University of Munich and director of the State Zoological Collection in Munich. It has since expanded worldwide through efforts by various non-profit and conservation organizations, including the Wildlife Conservation Society, the Audubon Society, and Canada’s Nature Discovery Fund. A German non-profit, BIOPAT (Patrons for Biodiversity) has raised more than $450,000 for research and conservation through sponsorship of over 100 species.

Individuals, companies, and other institutions may purchase the right to name species. This provides a new way for corporations to promote themselves in media and advertising campaigns. Specific uses of funds raised through such sales and auctions include supporting surveys of bat populations in Sri Lanka, implementing taxonomic training programmes in Myanmar, and undertaking an inventory of Bolivian orchids in the Tariquia conservation area.

For more information, see http://www.biopat.de/  or contact Mr. Claus Batke, President of BIOPAT claus.baetka@gtz.de

A A Print this page
Search the Manual
Guidelines Search
Case Studies Search
» More Search Tools
Resources for
Guideline 41(g)
Case Studies
Equitable Distribution of Funds from Mining in Sierra Leone
Economic Mechanisms in Asia
Gambia’s Environmental Awards
Demand-Side Management in the Power Sector in Thailand
Ecotourism in Kenya
Economic Instruments in Barbados
Financing Conservation Efforts by Selling the Naming Rights of New Species
USEPA’s Economic Instrument Providing Incentives to Exceed Compliance
Environmental Compensation in Brazil
Georgia’s Renewable Energy Revolving Fund
The Green Fund of Trinidad & Tobago
Uganda’s National Environment Fund
Ghana’s Environmental Fund
Environmental Funds in Bulgaria
EECCA Environmental Funds and Good Practices of Public Environmental Expenditure Management
The Polluter-Pays Principle and the Ecological Fund in Uzbekistan
Philippines’ Integrated Protected Area Fund
Zimbabwe’s Carbon Tax and Environmental Fund
Environment Funds in the Kyrgyz Republic
Developing and Enhancing Green Taxes in Norway
The Gambia’s Environmental Taxes
Ecological Goods and Services Tax at the Sub-National Level in Brazil
Tax Provisions to Implement MEAs in St. Lucia
Tax Exemptions for Private Natural Heritage Reserves in Brazil
Additional Resources
Additional Resources On Economic Instruments
© UNEP | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map