United Nations Environment Programme

environment for development

 
Division of Environmental Law and Conventions
Manual on Compliance with and Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Alert someone to this resource Leave Feedback Home > Enforcement > Institutional Frameworks > Economic Instruments > Case Study
Environmental Compensation in Brazil

In Brazil, when a project causes a significant environmental impact, a portion of the total cost of the project needs to be paid into an environmental fund. Federal Law No. 9985, of July 18, 2000, which established the National System of Nature Conservation Areas, requires project proponents to pay not less than 0.5% of the total cost of the project into the fund as environmental compensation, whenever the that project is expected to cause significant environmental impacts. The environmental office in charge of managing the particular area (or areas) determines which conservation area(s) is able to receive compensation as a result of the project’s impacts. If compensation is warranted, the office also decides the exact amount of the compensation, based on the degree of impact.

When a project is expected to harm a specific conservation area, the environmental office in charge of managing that conservation area is responsible for approving the license for the project. When compensation is warranted, the compensation monies must be spent on the conservation area that is harmed and spent on creating a new conservation area, depending on the criteria of the office.

According to Federal Decree No. 4340, of August 22, 2002, which complements Federal Law No. 9985, the compensation that is paid must be invested according to the following order of priority (highest priority first):

  • I. Fixing the boundaries of the conservation area and other activities related to regularizing the lands;
  • II. Elaboration, revision, or implementation of the management plan;
  • III. Paying for equipment and facilities necessary to implement, manage, monitor, and protect the area and its buffer zones;
  • IV. Development of studies necessary to create a new conservation area; and
  • V. Development of research necessary to manage the conservation area and its buffer zones.

Recently, negotiations led to the creation of an Environmental Compensation Fund, which will be an alternative to developers and other entities that need to pay environmental compensation but do not want to get involved in a bureaucratic process. This Fund will be financed by monies paid as compensation, and these monies will be applied to the creation, management, and implementation of Parks, Reserves, and other protected areas. The Fund is based on two premises: improving the efficiency of investing funds in order to really benefit conservation areas and facilitating the implementation of the law.

The Economic Federal Bank is in charge of managing the Fund. It will offer facilities to developers. All the contributions to the fund will be submitted to public proceedings in order to ensure transparency in the environmental compensation process.

For more information, contact raquel.breda@mma.gov.br, maria-carolina.hazin@mma.gov.br, or larissa.godoy@mma.gov.br

A A Print this page
Search the Manual
Guidelines Search
Case Studies Search
» More Search Tools
Resources for
Guideline 41(g)
Case Studies
Equitable Distribution of Funds from Mining in Sierra Leone
Economic Mechanisms in Asia
Gambia’s Environmental Awards
Demand-Side Management in the Power Sector in Thailand
Ecotourism in Kenya
Economic Instruments in Barbados
Financing Conservation Efforts by Selling the Naming Rights of New Species
USEPA’s Economic Instrument Providing Incentives to Exceed Compliance
Environmental Compensation in Brazil
Georgia’s Renewable Energy Revolving Fund
The Green Fund of Trinidad & Tobago
Uganda’s National Environment Fund
Ghana’s Environmental Fund
Environmental Funds in Bulgaria
EECCA Environmental Funds and Good Practices of Public Environmental Expenditure Management
The Polluter-Pays Principle and the Ecological Fund in Uzbekistan
Philippines’ Integrated Protected Area Fund
Zimbabwe’s Carbon Tax and Environmental Fund
Environment Funds in the Kyrgyz Republic
Developing and Enhancing Green Taxes in Norway
The Gambia’s Environmental Taxes
Ecological Goods and Services Tax at the Sub-National Level in Brazil
Tax Provisions to Implement MEAs in St. Lucia
Tax Exemptions for Private Natural Heritage Reserves in Brazil
Additional Resources
Additional Resources On Economic Instruments
© UNEP | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map