United Nations Environment Programme

environment for development

 
Division of Environmental Law and Conventions
Manual on Compliance with and Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Alert someone to this resource Leave Feedback Home > Enforcement > Institutional Frameworks > Public Participation Processes > Case Study
Telephone “Hotlines” and Internet in the United States

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state environmental agencies host numerous telephone “hotlines.” To facilitate access, these hotlines accept information at all times and pay the telephone charges. These hotlines provide both a means for members of the public to report environmental problems and to receive information in answer to their questions about environmental requirements and good practices. EPA also encourages the use of the Internet by the public to access information and to report an environmental violation or emergency. For the on-line reporting form, see http://www.epa.gov/
compliance/complaints/index.html

EPA hotlines include (but are not limited to) those for: Air and Radiation, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Hazardous and Solid Waste, Pollution Prevention, Water (including Wetlands Protection), Environmental Justice, and Endangered Species. The EPA’s Inspector General Hotline receives and responds to complaints alleging fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement within the EPA. A vast amount of pollution-control compliance and enforcement information is available by Internet at http://www.epa.gov/compliance

Experience in the United States suggests that telephone hotlines are used most frequently by those who expect a high “quality of life.” For this portion of the population, hotlines can create a direct line of communication between the affected public and the Government agency responsible for enforcement. However, research suggests that persons who experience the most frequent or severe environmental burdens or violations often are disinclined to use hotlines and unable to use the Internet. Such persons may have low expectations of environmental quality, may face language barriers, distrust government, and often feel disempowered or disenfranchised. Accordingly, while hotlines can be useful, other sources of information and other approaches are necessary to assist the most disadvantaged and environmentally impacted communities, where help is most needed.

For more information, see http://www.epa.gov/epahome/hotline.htm

A A Print this page
Search the Manual
Guidelines Search
Case Studies Search
» More Search Tools
Resources for
Guideline 41(k)
Case Studies
Cameroon’s National Project for Participatory Development
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process in Cameroon
Public Participation in Developing Laws and Regulations in Georgia
Citizens Submission of Draft Laws in Brazil
Romania’s Experience with Local Agenda 21
A Participatory Process for Developing Trinidad & Tobago’s NBSAP
NGO Involvement in Romania’s National Commission on Climate Change
Public Participation in International Forums
Public and Private Enforcement of the Wildlife Act in the Philippines
Telephone “Hotlines” and Internet in the United States
Honorary Fish Wardens in Fiji
NGO-Governmental Collaboration in Enforcing Wildlife Laws in Cameroon
A Survey of Some Countries’ Approach to Involving Citizens Groups and NGOs
The Philippines: Stakeholder Involvement in National Planning and Implementation of Plant Genetic Resources Activities
Evolution of Public Participation in Bulgaria
Additional Resources
Additional Resources on Environmental Impact Assessment
Additional Resources on Public Participation in the Development of Plans and Programmes
Additional Resources On Public Participation In International Forums
Additional Resources On Public Participation
© UNEP | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map