United Nations Environment Programme

environment for development

 
Division of Environmental Law and Conventions
Manual on Compliance with and Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Alert someone to this resource Leave Feedback Home > Enforcement > Institutional Frameworks > Public Participation Processes > Case Study
Honorary Fish Wardens in Fiji

Under section 3 of Fiji’s Fisheries Act Cap. 158, the Minister responsible for fisheries “may appoint honorary fish wardens whose duties shall be the prevention and detection of offences under this Act and the enforcement of the provisions thereof.” The appointment and broad responsibility of honorary fish wardens has been recognised in Fiji law since 1959 (s.2, Ordinance 34 of 1959).

Honorary fish wardens are vital in the policing of iqoliqoli or customary fishing grounds in Fiji. The area covered by an iqoliqoli commonly does not go beyond the outer limits of reefs. Within iqoliqoli, customary owners in parts of Fiji have established Locally Managed Marine Areas (LMMAs). Such LMMAs may provide local rules on the harvesting of certain species, management of fishing and other uses, or set a moratorium on fishing or other activities. By providing incentives and resources, there is great potential for wardens to also police other activities in near-shore areas that may affect marine ecosystems.

An honorary warden is usually a member of the tribe or clan that owns an iqoliqoli. While their responsibilities under the Fisheries Act is broad to include the prevention, detection, and enforcement of offences in Fijian fisheries waters, wardens also play a critical role in monitoring, controlling, and surveillance activities within their respective fishing grounds. Their effectiveness is constrained by the vast areas of sea to police and the limited financial resources, incentives, and equipment.

The effectiveness of fish wardens into the future rests on the adequate provisions of training, incentives, resources, and tools to carry out their tasks. At the legislative level, there is a need to further define roles and responsibilities and elaborate on the relationship between wardens at the village level and law enforcement authorities and courts at the national level.

For further information, see http://www.wwfpacific.org.fj/fiji_flmma_info.htm or contact manoa_p@usp.ac.fj

A A Print this page
Search the Manual
Guidelines Search
Case Studies Search
» More Search Tools
Resources for
Guideline 41(k)
Case Studies
Cameroon’s National Project for Participatory Development
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process in Cameroon
Public Participation in Developing Laws and Regulations in Georgia
Citizens Submission of Draft Laws in Brazil
Romania’s Experience with Local Agenda 21
A Participatory Process for Developing Trinidad & Tobago’s NBSAP
NGO Involvement in Romania’s National Commission on Climate Change
Public Participation in International Forums
Public and Private Enforcement of the Wildlife Act in the Philippines
Telephone “Hotlines” and Internet in the United States
Honorary Fish Wardens in Fiji
NGO-Governmental Collaboration in Enforcing Wildlife Laws in Cameroon
A Survey of Some Countries’ Approach to Involving Citizens Groups and NGOs
The Philippines: Stakeholder Involvement in National Planning and Implementation of Plant Genetic Resources Activities
Evolution of Public Participation in Bulgaria
Additional Resources
Additional Resources on Environmental Impact Assessment
Additional Resources on Public Participation in the Development of Plans and Programmes
Additional Resources On Public Participation In International Forums
Additional Resources On Public Participation
© UNEP | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map