United Nations Environment Programme

environment for development

 
Division of Environmental Law and Conventions
Manual on Compliance with and Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Alert someone to this resource Leave Feedback Home > Enforcement > National Laws & Regulations > Checklist
Checklist for Economic Valuation Studies

Economic valuation studies can be done for many purposes. They can serve as the core for:

  • cost-benefit analyses (e.g., for deciding whether to become a Party to an MEA or for examining legal or regulatory options), or
  • assessing the damage to natural resources and the environment (e.g., in deciding an appropriate penalty in a case).

    In conducting an economic valuation, States and the individuals performing the valuation may consider the following:

    • Start the analysis simply, with the most easily valued environmental impacts. Any analysis will quickly become complicated, so it is important to focus on the major environmental issues, and especially those where valuation is most feasible. This often means a focus on production or health impacts. In other situations it may be loss of recreational benefits.
    • Recognise the symmetry between benefits and costs. In the case of air or water pollution, health costs avoided (including costs of treatment, drugs, and lost work-days) are an important measure of the benefits from pollution reduction.
    • Always carry out the analysis in a with-intervention and without-intervention framework. The correct comparison is not between now and some time in the future, but rather between what would be the situation with the intervention, versus what would be the situation without the intervention. In some cases conditions may worsen over time, even with the proposed intervention, but would have become even worse had no action been taken.
    • State all assumptions explicitly, and identify data used and any additional data needs. Others can assess the analysis and results only if they clearly understand the assumptions and data used. Such understanding will allow replication of the analysis using alternative assumptions and/or data.
    • Finally, valuation studies should be well documented and should pass peer review. This step helps ensure that the results are credible and can be used for policy analysis.

    Source: OECD Background Paper on Valuing Environmental Benefits and Damages in the NIS: Opportunities to Integrate Environmental Concerns into Policy and Investment Decisions, available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/48/2382184.pdf 

    See also case study on “Resources on Defining and Valuing Environmental Damage” following Guideline 40(c) and discussion of economic instruments following Guideline 41(g).

    A A Print this page
    Search the Manual
    Guidelines Search
    Case Studies Search
    » More Search Tools
    Resources for
    Guideline 40
    Case Studies
    Inter-Agency Cooperation in Drafting a CITES Law for St. Lucia
    Developing a Framework Environmental Law in Sudan
    Issue-Based Modules to Facilitate Synergetic Implementation of Related MEAs
    Financial Analysis of Proposed Legislative Actions in Macedonia
    Cost Estimates in Romania
    CITES Project on Cost-Benefit Analysis of Wildlife in Madagascar
    Regulatory Impact Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis in Uganda
    Limitations of Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Partnership Project for the Development of Environmental Laws and Institutions in Africa (PADELIA)
    CITES National Legislation Project
    Use of Consultants to Assist in Drafting Legislation to Implement MEAs in St. Lucia
    Consultants to Facilitate Legislative Development: Ugandan Forest Sector Legislation
    Incorporating MEAs into National Environmental Action Plans (NEAPs) in Georgia
    Checklists
    Checklist for Economic Valuation Studies
    Additional Resources
    Additional Resources on Synergetic Integration of MEAs into National Laws
    © UNEP | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map