|About UNEP||UNEP Offices||News Centre||Publications||Events||Awards||Milestones||UNEP Store|
|Table of contents
Preface Annex 1
OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS
IMPACTS ON BIODIVERSITY
While many environmental contaminants degrade quickly in the environment, others (Buccini 2004):
Persistent chemicals can, through natural environmental processes, be distributed over long distances, leading to regional and global contamination (Buccini 2004). Many of these enter the food chain and are retained in organisms at concentrations higher than those in food and water – a process known as biomagnification. These substances are said to be bioaccumulative. In recent decades, there has been increased attention paid to addressing the risks posed by substances that are persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT), POPs and some metal compounds. However, many other chemicals, thought to be less harmful, are having significant negative impacts on biodiversity and human health (WWF 2004a).
Chemical pollution compromises the integrity of ecosystems, and thus directly threatens biodiversity. The increased discharge of nitrogen compounds from fertilizers in rivers can result in the eutrophication of surface and coastal seawater, and, in extreme cases, a state of complete oxygen depletion (anoxia) which severely affects the ecosystem and results in fish deaths. Excessive use of chemical fertilizers also contributes to the degradation of land through salinization, thus limiting agricultural production potential.
Chemicals pose many threats to wildlife. Research over many decades has demonstrated the adverse and often irreversible effects of POPs, PCBs, and heavy metals on the endocrine systems, especially reproductive hormones (WWF 2004a). These disruptions are now understood to have much more extensive effects including on thyroid and pituitary systems. Neurological damage is a common feature of chemical poisoning and many chemicals are carcinogenic. With the increase in chemical use these impacts on wild animals have increased (WWF 2004b). Chemicals previously thought to be safe, but with negative impacts on wildlife include (WWF 2004a):
Increasing human consumption and poor waste management are key factors in this growing threat to biodiversity.