|
The risk of land degradation is linked to forest cover. A complex set
of forces determines the future of forests in the region. Population growth,
including urban expansion in all scenarios and economic improvements in
all but a Security First situation, lead to mounting demand for
agricultural land at the expense of forest area. Efforts to address the
problems of mega-cities in the worlds of Policy First and Sustainability
First also increase deforestation as settlement programmes encourage
wider dispersal. In a Security First world there are added pressures
as the poor are pushed onto ever more marginal lands.
| Key to charts |
 |
 |
These pressures are cushioned to some degree by advances in agricultural
technology but the effects differ across scenarios. Advances may be most
rapid in Markets First, but probably do not have environmental
protection as their key goal. More importantly, economic forces such as
rising prices for timber and non-timber forest products, which can encourage
both deforestation and reforestation, are balanced against reductions
in subsidies that have driven conversion of forest and woodlands to agriculture,
and other economic instruments introduced to improve conservation. These
all influence the area and condition of remaining forests. Market instruments
play the biggest role in a world of Markets First. These are complemented
in the worlds of Policy First and Sustainability First by
government and local programmes to subsidize reforestation and encourage
a shift to agroforestry, and by direct efforts to preserve biodiversity.
The net result is that the total area of forest in Asia and the Pacific
declines over this period, but this effect differs significantly across
sub-regions and scenarios. South and Southeast Asia suffer the most significant
losses in total forest area. Whereas Northwest Pacific and East Asia experience
a net increase in forest area due to plantations, the total area of undisturbed
natural forest declines. In Australia and New Zealand and the South Pacific,
the effect of replanting is such that more new forest is created than
is used for logging or other production.
Water stress is presently one of the most contentious problems in Asia
and the Pacific, leaving aside the small Pacific Island Countries (PICs),
and it remains high on the agenda for the foreseeable future (see on the
right). Growth in demand is especially high in a Markets First world,
but also in Policy First and Sustainability First, where
economic growth is similarly robust. Water pricing and more efficient
use of water in agriculture due to advances in biotechnology help to temper
this growth. Under the Markets First scenario, water withdrawals
increase in all sectors, especially when further expansion of irrigated
area is assumed. These increases in water withdrawals lead to an expansion
of areas with severe water stress in South and Southeast Asia in all scenarios
and more people are affected throughout the region. In Security First
overall growth in demand is moderated by slower economic growth in
many sub-regions and no further expansion in irrigated areas, rather than
any significant efforts to become more efficient.
| Key to charts |
 |
 |
Under the Policy First and Sustainability First scenarios,
where effective policies and lifestyle changes combine with greater regional
cooperation and technology transfer, water withdrawals remain at current
levels or even decrease in most of the rest of Asia. However, with population
growth continuing, the number of people living in areas under severe water
stress continues to increase across Asia.
Urban areas, especially the growing mega-cities in South, Southeast and
East Asia, face many trials in addition to water stress. They include
land use pressures, air and water pollution and solid waste overload.
All these challenges are related to rapidly growing populations, from
both natural growth and rural-urban migration, and increasing economic
activity. Trends in local and regional air pollution depend heavily on
choices in energy production. If coal continues to dominate, as is likely
in a Security First situation with reduced trade or in a world
of Markets First where the cost is what counts, then local air
pollution tends to worsen significantly.
The increase is most evident in Security First, where little effort
is made to control sulphur emissions from stationary sources and nitrogen
oxide emissions from stationary and mobile sources (see charts above).
The setting and enforcement of regulations prescribing cleaner fuels and
fuel uses, cleaner technology and upgraded emission standards, all help
to curb these trends in a Policy First world. In Sustainability
First, major efforts towards decentralization with dispersed satellite
cities relieve the pressures. This step, combined with better physical
planning and management of urban systems, leads to more effective coordination
of growth, distribution of clean industry, servicing, handling of pollution
streams and housing design.
These policies help to buffer ill-effects in the
Policy First and Sustainability First scenarios, but the
higher levels of economic growth make environmental protection difficult.
In all scenarios, the amount of built-over land grows significantly across
the region (see chart on the right).
Similarly, CO2 emissions and production of solid waste (see
above) increase in most scenarios. Emission standards, which tend to be
weak or lacking in a Security First situation, help to limit the
growth in air pollutants in the other scenarios, especially in Policy
First. Emissions of CO2 increase more rapidly in Markets
First circumstances because of high economic growth. In Policy
First, advanced technologies are introduced to reduce CO2
emissions. Because a Sustainability First society shifts from conventional
to sustainable lifestyles, CO2 emissions are somewhat mitigated.
On the other hand a Security First society holds on to technologies
with low energy efficiency. CO2 emissions increase most rapidly
in this scenario everywhere except in Central Asia where low economic
activities mitigate CO2 emissions vis-à-vis Markets First.
The effects of lifestyle changes are also evident in the lower levels
of solid waste production in Sustainability First.
|