|
Both Canada and the US suffered a severe fire season. In Canada,
the 2003 fire season was especially harsh in the Province of British
Columbia. For example, in August 2003, the provincial government
issued its most restrictive travel advisory ever after a wildfire
near the city of Kelowna grew fivefold in a day. The wildfire
at Okanagan Mountain Provincial Park, which started at a relatively
manageable size, grew over several weeks, eventually covering
more than 250 km2 . Gusting winds, bone-dry forests and a lack
of rain were blamed for the fire’s growth. Two-kilometre-wide
fire fronts burned through timber at rates of up to 50 metres
per minute. The Province of British Columbia estimates that it
spent more than US$400 million fighting forest fires in 2003 (Makarenko
2003).
In the US, in October 2003, fires raging from just north of Los
Angeles to the Mexican border became one of the worst natural
disasters to strike California State in years, darkening the skies,
and raining ash over much of the surrounding area (Figure 1).
In all, the southern California fires killed 20 people, burned
almost 300 000 ha and destroyed about 3 400 homes. They are considered
the worst in the state’s modern history (Keating and Whitcomb
2003).
|
|
|
 |
|
Figure 1: In the top image taken on 26 October,
2003, vegetation is green, burned area is reddish, smoke
is blue, and the blazing fire front is hot pink. In the
bottom image taken on 18 November after fires had subsided,
the burned areas are in darker red areas north of the urban
development.
Source: Image courtesy NASA/GSFC/LaRC/JPL, MISR Team |
One of the major policy developments in the US is a new forestry
bill, approved by the US Senate in 2003 (White House 2003b). It
will give managers of the nation’s 155 national forests more
leeway to approve logging and other commercial projects with less
formal environmental review. The plan overhauls the 1976 National
Forest Management Act, easing environmental rules and allowing more
tree thinning. California’s lawmakers, who consider that thinning
underbrush and small trees is crucial to prevent devastating wildfires,
have praised the bill (Daly 2003). |
|