Assessment
Process - Help Prompts for each Field
Context
Context refers to the overall strategic, institutional,
legal, financial, political and administrative characteristics of the assessment
process. These have a bearing on the saliency, legitimacy and credibility of the
overall process.
1.
Provide
full, official name of assessment process e.g. Global Environment Outlook.
2.
Provide
acronym by which the assessment is commonly known e.g. GEO.
3.
Provide
outline description of the overall goals of the assessment process citing the specific
issues addressed.
4.
Select
from table the lead institution or institutions responsible for the management of
the overall assessment process.
5.
Describe
the various decision-making foray responsible for receiving and considering the
findings of the assessment process.
6.
Provide
an overall summary of the mandates underpinning the assessment process without going
into specific details.
7.
Select
the specific mandates underpinning the assessment process.
If an individual mandate is not available in the pop-up list, use the free
text box to describe it.
8.
Describe
the overall scope of the assessment process including specific questions to be addressed
and interlinkages among various sectors.
The description of the scope should present a clear picture of the overall comprehensiveness
of the process.
9.
Describe
the working modalities of the assessment process.
Include references to how the assessment was organised and how participants
were engaged. Issues such as networking,
the use of working groups, scientific engagement, collaboration with stakeholder
such as UN agencies and NGOs, and peer review mechanisms, etc should be described.
10.
Describe the total cost of
the Assessment Process
11.
Describe the funding mechanism
used to finance the overall assessment process citing budgetary sources and estimates
of financial and in-kind contributions
12.
Describe in general terms
the periodicity of assessments being carried out or planned under the process
Scale
Scale refers to the geographic,
thematic and temporal boundaries of the assessment process
13.
Specify start date (year)
of the process
14.
Select broad and narrow keywords
that describe the thematic coverage of the assessment process.
Use the free text box to provide a keyword that is not available in the thesaurus.
15.
Select as appropriate the
region, sub-region, country, or specify another geographic domain (e.g. Carpathians,
Mesopotamia
marshlands) that best describes the geographic coverage of the assessment process.
16.
Specify the time period (in
years) covered by the assessment process. An end date in the future is permitted.
Participation
Participation
refers to the modalities of engagement of both individual experts and institutions
at all stages of the assessment process from planning through to implementation. Participation has a bearing on legitimacy.
17.
Describe the mechanism used
for identifying and engaging partners in the assessment process
Effectiveness
Effectiveness refers to the overall
outcome of the assessment process and the various impacts it had.
These have a bearing on salience, legitimacy and credibility.
18.
To report objectively on the
impact of an assessment process, it is necessary to consider a number of relevant
factors related to impacts, not all of which may necessarily be applicable. Please examine each of the following
factors and use the questions posed in the help commands to frame your responses.
a.
Did the
assessment process lead to the formulation of new law and policy, strategies, programmes
or action plans to protect environmental resources?
b.
Did the
assessment process lead to improved implementation of existing law and policy, strategies,
programmes or action plans?
c.
Did the
assessment process lead to a change in human behaviour (changes in consumption patters,
waste management, decision-making, actions to protect resources, etc)
d.
Did the
assessment process stimulate new research being undertaken in one or more of the
thematic areas covered by the assessment?
e.
Did the
assessment process lead to improved environmental monitoring systems and better
data collection mechanisms?
f.
Did the
assessment process lead to improved information dissemination and exchange among
stakeholders involved directly in the assessment (scientists, decision-makers, ..)
and others indirectly (e.g. media, NGOs, educationalists) ?
g.
Did the
assessment process lead to increased capacity of the institutions involved in planning
and conducting the assessment process i.e. enabling them to generate or contribute
to new sub-processes and individual assessments in specific areas?
h.
Did the
assessment process lead to increased public awareness, through the media and other
channels of communication, of the issues considered by the process.
i.
Specify
other factors deemed necessary to describe positive impacts generated by the assessment
process.
19.
Describe the main strengths
of the process with reference to context, scale, participation and effectiveness.
20.
Describe the main strengths
of the process with reference to context, scale, participation and effectiveness.